1Ein Klick auf die deutsche Flagge führt zur deutschen Version

 

Achtung: Beim Anklicken der Sprachsymbole verlieren Sie alle bisherigen Eintragungen!
Warning: If you click on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded!
 

 
 

Thank you for participating in the teaching evaluation of the Faculty of Engineering.

In order to obtain sufficient information to guarantee a satisfactory quality assurance, the questions marked with "►►" are mandatory.

Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Kai Willner, Dean of Studies
Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Officer  

2Personal and Course Information

2.1

2.2

2.5

2.7

2.8

3Mandatory Questions on the Lecture Course and Lecturer

3.1

►► The lecture course is consistent with the corresponding topics and skills in the module handbook.

strongly agree

strongly disagree



3.2

►► How well is the integration of the lecture course within your program of studies?

very well integrated

very poorly integrated



3.3

►► The structure of the lecture course is:

very good

very poor


 

3.4

►► How well are the content and organisation of the lecture course harmonised with the associated exercises/labs/tutorials?

very well

very poorly



3.5

►► The lecturer appears committed and motivated during the lecture course.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

3.6

►► Taken as a whole I am . . . . with this lecture course.

very satisfied

very unsatisfied


 

4Comments on the Lecture Course and Lecturer

 

Please restrict the comments to this lecture course, its relevance to your degree program and the lecturer (please mention the name, if there are several lecturers). Other comments should be provided on the Study Situation Questionnaire of the FAU or the Faculty of Engineering. 

4.1


4.2


4.3


5Optional Questions on the Lecture Course and Lecturer

5.1I would like to answer optional questions to lecture course and lecturer.

5.2

The learning objectives and key topics of focus of this lecture course are:

easily identifiable

not identifiable


 

5.3

The lecturer raises interest for the subject.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.4

The lecturer clearly shows relations to practical or research subjects.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.5

The line of thought of the lecture course is mostly recognizable.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.6

The presented content is comprehensible and there is sufficient time to follow the arguments.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.7

The style of presentation of the lecturer is:

very appealing

very unappealing


 

5.8

The lecturer responds to questions and issues of the students.

very keenly

not at all


 

5.9

The use of, and balance between the audio-visual aids (blackboard, overhead projector, data projector, etc.) used is:

appropriate

inappropriate


 

5.10

The experiments, simulations, examples, applications, etc. shown in the lecture course aid in understanding the subject.

strongly agree

strongly disagree



5.11

Based on advice given during the lecture course, as well as the lecture notes and related textbooks, student-oriented preparation and revision of material relating to the course is:

well supported

poorly supported


 

5.12

The connection of the taught material to the examination requirements is sufficiently highlighted.

strongly agree

strongly disagree



6Level of Difficulty and Time Investment

6.1

The level of difficulty of the material is

rather too low

rather too high


 

6.2

6.3

The time I invest for this lecture course is:

rather too low

rather too high


 

7Questions Raised by the Lecturer