1Ein Klick auf die deutsche Flagge führt zur deutschen Version
Achtung: Beim Anklicken der Sprachsymbole verlieren Sie alle bisherigen Eintragungen!
Warning: If you click on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded!

 

Questionnaire for Supplementary Courses in the Faculty of Engineering:

Thank you for participating in the teaching evaluation of WS 2015/16.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. A.P. Fröba, Dean of Studies
Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Coordinator

In order to obtain sufficient information to guarantee a satisfactory quality assurance, the questions marked with "►►" are mandatory. 

2Personal and Course Information

2.1

2.2

2.5

2.7

3Mandatory Questions on the Supplementary Course and Tutor

3.1

►► The supplementary course is consistent with the corresponding topics and skills in the module handbook.

strongly agree

strongly disagree

3.2

►► How well is the integration of the supplementary course within your program of studies?

very well integrated

very poorly integrated

3.3

►► The structure of the supplementary course is:

very good

very poor
 
3.4

►► How well are the content and organisation of the supplementary course harmonised with the associated lecture course?

very well

very poorly
 
3.5

►► The tutor appears committed and motivated during the supplementary course.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
3.6

►► Taken as a whole I am . . . . with this supplementary course.

very satisfied

very unsatisfied
 

4Comments on the Supplementary Course and Tutor

 

Please restrict the comments to this supplementary course, its relevance to your degree program, the tutor (please mention the name, if there are several groups/tutors), the evaluation and the questionnaire itself. Other comments (e.g. pertaining to the overall content or organization of your degree program) should be provided on the Study Situation Questionnaire of the Faculty of Engineering. 

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4I would like to answer optional questions to supplementary course and tutor.

5Optional Questions on the Supplementary Course and Tutor

5.1

The learning objectives and key topics of focus of this supplementary course are:

easily identifiable

not identifiable
 
5.2

I am well instructed to solve exercises on my own.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
5.3

The applicability of the content is well illustrated e.g. by examples.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
5.4

The chosen form of the supplementary course (way to treat exercises, programming, etc.) is suitable to impart the knowledge of the content.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
5.5

The presented exercises and solutions are comprehensible and there is sufficient time to follow the arguments.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
5.6

The style of presentation of the tutor is:

very appealing

very unappealing
 
5.7

The tutor responds to questions and issues of the students.

very keenly

not at all
 
5.8

The use of, and balance between the audio-visual aids (blackboard, overhead projector, data projector, etc.) used is:

appropriate

inappropriate
 
5.9

The supplied material is appropriate in its amount and quality for the purpose of the supplementary course.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
5.10

With the help of the compiled supplementary course material it is . . . . to deepen the understanding of the lecture/module subject:

well possible

hardly possible
 
5.11

The connection to the examination requirements is sufficiently highlighted.

strongly agree

strongly disagree
 
6.1

The level of difficulty of this supplementary course is:

rather too low

rather too high
 

6.2

6.3

The time I invest for this supplementary course is:

rather too low

rather too high
 

7.1I would like to answer specific questions from the tutor
. . . . (only relevant if the tutor has defined any questions).

8Questions from the Tutor