[ORGANIZATION]
[AUTHOR]
[SUBUNIT]
[Survey for Exercises]

Ein Klick auf die deutsche Flagge führt zur deutschen Version
Warning: If you klick on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded !!

General Questionnaire: An e-mail will be sent end of january to all students of the Faculty of Technical Sciences.
Please check your e-mail address (forename.surname@department.stud.uni-erlangen.de)! 

Personal Information

My Homework

General Aspects of the Supplementary Course

Objective, structure and main focus of the content of this supplementary course are: clear  not recognizable   
The quantity of this supplementary course is: appropriate  inappropriate   
The technical level of this supplementary course is: appropriate  inappropriate   
The chosen form of the supplementary course (way to treat problems, programming, etc.) is suitable to impart the knowledge of the content. applies  doesn´t apply   

Didactic Aspects

The presentation of problems and solutions is comprehensible and there is sufficient time to follow the arguments. applies  doesn´t apply   
Applicability of the content is made clear by the examples. applies  doesn´t apply   
I am well instructed to solve problems on my own. applies  doesn´t apply   
The relation to the lecture and the examination requirements is established. applies  doesn´t apply   

Presentation by the Tutor

The presentation by the tutor is: appealing  not appealing   
The tutor verifies that problems and solutions have been understood and deals competently with questions. applies  doesn´t apply   

Media

The use of audio-visual aids (blackboard, overhead projector, beamer, etc.) is: appropriate  inappropriate   
The supplied material is appropriate in its amount and quality for the purpose of the supplementary course. applies  doesn´t apply   
With the help of the compiled exercise material it is . . . . to deepen the understanding of the lecture material: well possible  hardly possible   

General Impression

My overall rating for this supplementary course is (grade 1 to 6): 1 = very good  6 = very poor   

Further Comments

Please restrict the comments to this supplementary course, its relevance to the study program, the tutor (please mention the name/number, if there are several tutors/groups), the evaluation and the questionnaire itself. Other comments should be inserted into the General Questionnaire of the Faculty of Engineering Sciences. 

Questions Defined by the Tutor

The possibly following optional questions were defined by the lecturer only for his information, they have no relevance for the central evaluation process. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thank you for participating in the evaluation of WS 2009/10.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. B. Schmauß, Dean of Studies
Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Coordinator