1Ein Klick auf die deutsche Flagge führt zur deutschen Version

 

Achtung: Beim Anklicken der Sprachsymbole verlieren Sie alle bisherigen Eintragungen!
Warning: If you click on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded!
 

 
 

Thank you for participating in the teaching evaluation of the Faculty of Engineering.

In order to obtain sufficient information to guarantee a satisfactory quality assurance, the questions marked with ""►►"" are mandatory.

Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Kai Willner, Dean of Studies
Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Officer 

2Personal and Course Information

2.1

2.2

3Mandatory Questions on the Seminar and Tutors

3.1

►► The seminar is consistent with the corresponding topics and skills in the module handbook.

strongly agree

strongly disagree



3.2

►► How well is the integration of the seminar within your program of studies?

very well integrated

very poorly integrated



3.3

►► The structure of the seminar is:

very good

very poor


 

3.4

►► How well are the content and organisation of the seminar harmonised with the associated lectures?

very well

very poorly



3.5

►► The tutor appears committed and motivated during the seminar.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

3.6

►► Taken as a whole I am . . . . with this seminar.

very satisfied

very unsatisfied


 

4Comments on the Seminar and Tutors

 

Please restrict the comments to this seminar, its relevance to your degree program and the tutors (please mention the tutor). Other comments should be provided on the Study Situation Questionnaire of the FAU or the Faculty of Engineering. 

 
4.1


4.2


4.3


4.4


4.5


5Optional Questions on the Seminar and Tutors

5.1I would like to answer optional questions to seminar and tutors.

5.2

The learning objectives and key topics of focus of this seminar are:

easily identifiable

not identifiable


 

5.3

The general introduction to the seminar is perfectly good.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.4

The formal needs and expectations of the tutors are:

easily identifiable

not identifiable


 

5.5

The selection of topics is well figured out.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.6

The tutors show up well prepared.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.7

The tutors create a pleasant working atmosphere.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.8

There is a reasonable amount of assistance through the tutors.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.9

The tutors give useful references (literature, strategy, execution).

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.10

The technical assistance for the speech (introduction to presentation techniques, slide samples, etc.) is good.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.11

There is an active participation in the discussion.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

5.12

There is a good balance between my learning effort and my time investment.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

6Level of Difficulty and Time Investment

6.1

6.2

6.3

The time I invest for this seminar is:

rather too low

rather too high


 

7Questions Raised by the Tutors

7.1

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.2

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.3


7.4


7.5

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.6

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.7


7.8


7.9

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.10

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.11


7.12


7.13

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.14

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.15


7.16


7.17

Vordefinierte optionale Frage

 

 


7.18

Vordefinierte optionale Frage