1Ein Klick auf die deutsche Flagge führt zur deutschen Version
Achtung: Beim Anklicken der Sprachsymbole verlieren Sie alle bisherigen Eintragungen!
Warning: If you click on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded!

 

Questionnaire for Seminars in the Faculty of Engineering:

Thank you for participating in the teaching evaluation of SS 2015.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. A.P. Fröba, Dean of Studies
Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Coordinator

In order to obtain sufficient information to guarantee a satisfactory quality assurance, the questions marked with "►►" are mandatory. 

2Personal and Course Information

2.1

2.2

3Mandatory Questions on the Seminar and Tutors

3.1

►► The seminar is consistent with the corresponding topics and skills in the module handbook.

strongly agree

strongly disagree



3.2

►► How well is the integration of the seminar within your program of studies?

very well integrated

very poorly integrated



3.3

►► The structure of the seminar is:

very good

very poor


 

3.4

►► How well are the content and organisation of the seminar harmonised with the associated lectures?

very well

very poorly



3.5

►► The tutors appear committed and motivated during the seminar.

strongly agree

strongly disagree


 

3.6

►► Taken as a whole I am . . . . with this seminar.

very satisfied

very unsatisfied


 

4Comments on the Seminar and Tutors

 

Please restrict the comments to this seminar, its relevance to your degree program, the tutors (please mention the name, if there are several groups/tutors), the evaluation and the questionnaire itself. Other comments (e.g. pertaining to the overall content or organization of your degree program) should be provided on the Study Situation Questionnaire of the Faculty of Engineering. 

4.1


4.2


4.3


4.4


4.5


4.6I would like to answer optional questions to seminar and tutors.

7.1I would like to answer specific questions from the tutors
. . . . (only relevant if the tutors have defined any questions).

8Questions from the Tutors