* * * only for review * * * Organisation: Teilbereich: Dozent/in: Umfrage: Univ. Erlangen-Nbg. Technische Fakultät Lecturer Lecture for review Warning: If you klick on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded !! General Questionnaire: An E-Mail will be sent to all students of the Faculty of Technical Sciences. Please check your email box (university email address)! Personal Information My study program is: Please select...PromotionPhDCE BachelorCE MasterCE EliteCBI BachelorCBI MasterCBI DiplomEEI/ET DiplomEI LehramtINF DiplomINF LehramtIuK DiplomMAP EliteMB BachelorMB MasterMB DiplomMECH Diplom(T)Math DiplomWINF DiplomWING DiplomWW BachelorWW MasterWW Diplomother I am in the . . . semester. Please select...1. Sem.2. Sem.3. Sem.4. Sem.5. Sem.6. Sem.7. Sem.8. Sem.9. Sem.10. Sem.> 10. Sem. I attend this course as part of my . . . Please select...GrundstudiumHauptstudium, mandatoryHauptstudium, not mandatoryBachelor programme, mandatoryBachelor programme, not mandatoryMaster programme, mandatoryMaster programme, not mandatory My Homework My average homework for preparation and revision of this subject for each double lecture (90 min.) amounts to: Please select...0 hours0,5 hours1 hour1,5 hours2 hours3 hours4 hours> 4 hours For this lecture I attend approximately . . . percent of all classes. Please select...less than 50%50 - 70%70 - 90%more than 90% General Aspects of the Lecture Course Objective, structure and main focus of the content of this lecture are: clear not recognizable   The quantity and the complexity of the material are: appropriate inappropriate   Connections and relations to other subjects of the study program are shown clearly. applies doesn´t apply   Didactic Aspects The imparted knowledge is comprehensible and there is sufficient time to follow the arguments. applies doesn´t apply   The line of thought of the lecture is always recognizable. applies doesn´t apply   The relation to the exercises and the examination requirements is established. applies doesn´t apply   Presentation by the Lecturer The presentation by the lecturer is: appealing not appealing   The lecturer raises interest for the subject. applies doesn´t apply   The lecturer verifies that the subject has been understood and deals competently with questions. applies doesn´t apply   Media The use of audio-visual aids (blackboard, overhead projector, beamer, etc.) is: appropriate inappropriate   With the handouts, lecture notes and recommended literature, preparation and revision of the lecture is: well possible hardly possible   General Impression My overall rating for this lecture is: 1 = very good 6 = very poor   Further Comments Please restrict the comments to this lecture course, its relevance to the study program, the lecturer, the evaluation and the questionnaire itself. Other comments should be inserted into the General Questionnaire of the Faculty of Engineering Sciences. Most appealing aspects: Less appealing aspects, possible improvements: In addition, I would like to make the following comments: Questions Defined by the Lecturer The possibly following optional questions were defined by the lecturer only for his information, they have no relevance for the central evaluation process. Thank you for participating in the evaluation of SS 2006. Prof. Dr.-Ing. W. Kellermann, Dean of Studies Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Coordinator   EvaSys V2.6 - Copyright (c) 2001-2006 Electric Paper GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.