* * * only for review * * * Organisation: Teilbereich: Dozent/in: Umfrage: Univ. Erlangen-Nbg. Technische Fakultät Tutor Exercise for review Warning: If you klick on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded !! General Questionnaire: An E-Mail will be sent to all students of the Faculty of Technical Sciences. Please check your email box (university email address)! Personal Information My study program is: Please select...PromotionPhDCE BachelorCE MasterCE EliteCBI BachelorCBI MasterCBI DiplomEEI/ET DiplomEI LehramtINF DiplomINF LehramtIuK DiplomMAP EliteMB BachelorMB MasterMB DiplomMECH Diplom(T)Math DiplomWINF DiplomWING DiplomWW BachelorWW MasterWW Diplomother I am in the . . . semester. Please select...1. Sem.2. Sem.3. Sem.4. Sem.5. Sem.6. Sem.7. Sem.8. Sem.9. Sem.10. Sem.> 10. Sem. I attend this course as part of my . . . Please select...GrundstudiumHauptstudium, mandatoryHauptstudium, not mandatoryBachelor programme, mandatoryBachelor programme, not mandatoryMaster programme, mandatoryMaster programme, not mandatory My Homework My average homework for preparation and revision of this supplementary course (for each 45 min.) amounts to: Please select...0 hours0,5 hours1 hour1,5 hours2 hours3 hours> 3 hours For this supplementary course I attend approximately . . . percent of all classes. Please select...less than 50%50 - 70%70 - 90%more than 90% General Aspects of the Supplementary Course Objective, structure and main focus of the content of this supplementary course are: clear not recognizable   Quantity and technical level of this supplementary course are: appropriate inappropriate   The chosen form of the supplementary course (way to treat problems, programming, etc.) is suitable to impart the knowledge of the content. applies doesn´t apply   Didactic Aspects The presentation of problems and solutions is comprehensible and there is sufficient time to follow the arguments. applies doesn´t apply   Applicability of the content is made clear by the examples. applies doesn´t apply   I am well instructed to solve problems on my own. applies doesn´t apply   The relation to the lecture and the examination requirements is established. applies doesn´t apply   Presentation by the Tutor The presentation by the tutor is: appealing not appealing   The tutor verifies that problems and solutions have been understood and deals competently with questions. applies doesn´t apply   Media The use of audio-visual aids (blackboard, overhead projector, beamer, etc.) is: appropriate inappropriate   The supplied material is appropriate in its amount and quality for the purpose of the supplementary course. applies doesn´t apply   With the help of the compiled exercise material it is . . . . to deepen the understanding of the lecture material: well possible hardly possible   General Impression My overall rating for this supplementary course is (grade 1 to 6): 1 = very good 6 = very poor   Further Comments Please restrict the comments to this lecture course, its relevance to the study program, the lecturer, the evaluation and the questionnaire itself. Other comments should be inserted into the General Questionnaire of the Faculty of Engineering Sciences. Most appealing aspects: Less appealing aspects, possible improvements: In addition, I would like to make the following comments: Questions Defined by the Tutor The possibly following optional questions were defined by the lecturer only for his information, they have no relevance for the central evaluation process. Thank you for participating in the evaluation of SS 2006. Prof. Dr.-Ing. W. Kellermann, Dean of Studies Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Coordinator   EvaSys V2.6 - Copyright (c) 2001-2006 Electric Paper GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.